2016 Perseid Meteor Shower

I got out to Sunset Crater National Monument northeast of Flagstaff, AZ to photograph and just bask in what turned out to be an awesome display. Running a couple cameras, I was not counting meteors every minute of every hour, but kind of collected numbers in batches:

0930-1030Z = 63 Perseids / 7 sporadics [rate of 63/hr]
1050-1105Z = 37 Perseids / 1 sporadic [rate of 148/hr]
1105-1120Z = 21 Perseids / 3 sporadics [rate of 84/hr]
1130-1200Z = 55 Perseids / 4 sporadics [rate of 110/hr]

No single hour added up close to 100/hr, but shorter 15-30 minute spans were pretty good in between lulls.

Composite shot covering multiple exposures between 2:36-4:29AM (0936-1129 UT).
There are 48 Perseids—including two spectacular fireballs—and 5 sporadics included in the shot. Each shot has been de-rotated/repositioned to account for Earth's rotation and to align the meteor to the star field that it crossed at the time of the exposure. All but four of the exposures were shot with a Canon T3i/600D and Rokinon 16 mm f/2 at 10 seconds, f/2, ISO 3200. The remaining four were captured by a Canon T3i/600D and Canon EF-S 10-22 mm at 10 seconds, 10 mm, f/3.5, ISO 6400.

After years of trying, I finally had a lens capable of f/2 and a fireball that wound up centered in the frame. It left a bright train that visually lasted over 30 seconds, followed by an orange train that was picked up by the time lapse camera from 0940 to at least 1025Z ...so 45 minutes for sure.

Persistent Train Sequence shot from 2:40-2:43 / 0940-0943Z — 12 August 2016

Time Lapse Video

2016 Perseid Fireball from Jeremy Perez on Vimeo.

Featured on Astronomy Picture of the Day - 19 August 2016


Nightscape Image Editing Tutorial

I just wrapped up a five-part video series that describes one of the methods I use to process nightscape photography. In particular, it focuses on dealing with excessive noise--in this case, working with a lens that only opens to f/3.5. At smaller apertures, one needs to boost ISO to especially noisy levels, or process brighter later, which still introduces greater noise. The stacking method in this tutorial series is meant to help manage excessive noise for whatever reason--small aperture, shorter exposure, older noisy sensor...

The alignment and stacking method that copes with wide angles and intervening landscapes is described in the first three videos using Lightroom, Photoshop and PTGui. The last two videos address processing steps taken in Lightroom and Photoshop to bring out the best in the image.

The finished image

Golden Valley Starlight - I

22064572405_6214dd509f_o (1).jpg


Messier 74

It's been nearly 11 years since I first observed and made a very simple sketch of M74 in 2004. Because it is seen face-on and has a low surface brightness, it is considered one of the more difficult Messier objects. When I first observed it with my 6-inch Newtonian from Wupatki National Monument, I made note that some mottling was visible--but definitely not shown in the sketch! With the 8-inch Dob and a bit more galaxy practice since then, I was really hoping to pick it apart.

Beyond the soft, diffuse glow and concentrated core, the first irregularity I noted was that the brighter central section elongated preferentially to the northwest. Next up, a dip in brightness on the east side of the core, stubs emerging from north and south, and more subtle patches on the northwest side helped define interesting structure.

This is also the subject of the "Object of the Month"/"Sketch It article" in the October 2015 issue of Astronomy Now.

SubjectMessier 74 (NGC 628)
ClassificationSpiral Galaxy SA(s)c
Position (J2000)*Pisces [RA: 1 36 41.6 / Dec: +15 47 03]*
Size*10.5' x 9.5' PA 25°
Brightness*9.5 vMag 10.0 bMag
Date/Time20 August 2015 - 2:00 AM
Observing Loc.Cinder Hills Overlook, Sunset Crater National Monument, Arizona
InstrumentOrion SkyQuest XT8 (203 mm f/5.9 Dobsonian)
Eyepieces/Mag.Pentax XW10 10 mm (120X)
Seeing6/10 Pickering
Transparency21.4 mag/arcsec^2
AKAM 74, UGC 1149, MCG+03-05-011, PGC 5974, h 142, GC 372, CGCG 460.014
*ReferencesNGCIC Project

Observation Notes:

This was the 2nd of 2 galaxies I observed the night of an observing trip out to Wupatki National Monument, north of Flagstaff. It was a large diffuse galaxy. The core was on the verge of being stellar, but I don't think I had enough aperture to make it out. It seemed to be elongated west to east and had a slightly mottled appearance.


M74 is a spiral galaxy that is 30 to 40 million light years away and is receding at 793 km/sec. It is roughly 95,000 light years in diameter, which is about the same size as our Milky Way Galaxy. The beautifully symetrical arms of M74 are salted with clusters of young blue stars, and pink emission nebulae. It was found by Pierre Méchain in September 1780. He reported the discovery to Charlse Messier who included it in his catalog in October 1780.

Date/Time9 October 2004 - 1:30 AM
Observing Loc.Wupatki National Monument, AZ
InstrumentOrion SVP 6LT Reflector (150 mm dia./1200 mm F/L)
Eyepieces/Mag.32 mm (47X)
Seeing4/10 Pickering
TransparencyMag 5.5


Before the bad weather rolled in, I drove out to Cinder Hills Overlook at Sunset Crater to get some dark sky shots of the comet. The tail was not as prominent as it was from home the night before. After checking out the shots, it looks like it was fanned wider with lots of streamers and detail. The best shots were tracked, 3-minute exposures. I was only able to wrap up with three of those before the Moon crested the horizon and started washing things out.

C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) - 9 January 2015 - 10:00 PM (10 January 2015 - 0500 UT)

Despite the tail being more challenging, the coma was still bright, and easily visible to the naked eye.


Venus and Mercury have been sharing space in the evening sky recently. This shot was taken along Route 66, east of Flagstaff.


Venus-Mercury Conjunction - 8 January 2015 - 6:01PM (9 January 2015 - 0101 UT)

I haven't made a trip to a dark sky location to observe, sketch and photograph the latest Lovejoy comet yet. But I did take a look with binoculars and grab some photos from my front yard tonight.

I took a few tripod shots in the general direction first and was impressed by how bright the comet appeared even with short exposures. The following image was shot at ISO 3200, 10 seconds, f/4.0, 55 mm.

C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) - 8 January 2015 - 10:40 PM (9 January 2015 - 0540 UT)

Tripod photo of C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) - 8 January 2015 - 10:18 PM (9 January 2015 - 0518 UT)

Since that worked so nicely, I brought out the SkyView Pro equatorial mount, did a rough polar alignment and started shooting some longer 30 second exposures zoomed in to 250 mm. This shot is a stack of 10 30-second exposures at f/5.6. I used median combine to separate comet from stars and recombine so the stars and comet were as sharp as possible. Too bad I didn't shoot any flat fields to get rid of the uneven background. But you can see a disruption in the ion tail toward the center of the frame.

C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) - 8 January 2015 - 10:40 PM (9 January 2015 - 0540 UT)

Equatorial tracked photo of C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) - 8 January 2015 - 10:40 PM (9 January 2015 - 0540 UT)

Enhanced Contrast of C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) - 8 January 2015 - 10:40 PM (9 January 2015 - 0540 UT)

Enhanced contrast of Equatorial tracked photo of C/2014 Q2 (Lovejoy) - 8 January 2015 - 10:40 PM (9 January 2015 - 0540 UT)

Through binoculars, the blue-green color was visible and about 2 degrees of the ion tail. It would be much better from a dark site, but still very impressive from here. With my stargazing glasses on, it was visible without magnification.

As long as my first astro run with the 250 mm lens was doing ok, I gave M42 a 30-second exposure. This lens might be fun for some more wide field work.

The Orion Nebula Complex

30-second Equatorial tracked photo of the Orion Nebula Complex - 8 January 2015


The Cerulean Arc

My weblog for
everything else non-astronomy

Pin at will!

(Thanks for maintaining
return links.)

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Recent Comments

  • Jeremy Perez: Thanks Andrew! These rare moments with huge research instruments that read more
  • Andrew Cooper: Beautiful sketches! I had an evening once on the 2.3m read more
  • Anonymous: Thank you for your reply, Jeremy, but what I really read more
  • Jeremy Perez: Yes, I've seen that effect, although I've mainly noticed it read more
  • Anonymous: Dear Jeremy I have read with great interest your notes read more
  • Louis Benoist: Beautifull, a million years of evolution, brings together, a read more
  • Jeremy Perez: Thanks Eric! read more
  • Eric Graff: Hi Jeremy, That white light sketch is just awesome!!! The read more
  • Jeremy Perez: Thanks very much Jen! Too bad we didn't get a read more
  • Jeremy Perez: Thanks Andrew! It's really impressive. I haven't had a chance read more


Monthly Archives

Powered by Movable Type 5.2.3